Thorium Nuclear Bombs (Shorter Version)

Thorium bred Uranium-233 can be used to make atomic bombs, despite what proponents may claim.

You don’t have to trust me on this, see what the experts at various institutions have to say below:

MIT Energy Initiative, The Future of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle

Appendix A starts on page 181 of the Appendices PDF file. The relevant statement from MIT is:

  • Proliferation And Security Groundrules:
    Irradiating thorium produces weapons-useable material. Policy decisions on appropriate ground rules are required before devoting significant resources toward such fuel cycles. U-233 can be treated two ways.
  • Analogous to U-235. If the U-235 content of uranium is less than 20% U-235 or less than 13% U-233 with the remainder being U-238, the uranium mixture is non-weapons material. However, isotopic dilution in U-238 can significantly compromise many of the benefits.
  • Analogous to plutonium. Plutonium can not be degraded thus enhanced safeguards are used. The same strategy can be used with U-233. A complicating factor (see below) is that U-233 is always contaminated with U-232 that has decay products that give off high energy gamma radiation which requires additional measures to protect worker health and safety. There has been no consensus on the safeguards / nonproliferation benefits of this radiation field.

The point being made here is that thorium can be used to make Uranium-233, which in turn can be used to make bombs. The complicating U-232 contamination mentioned above is what many of the thorium proponents refer to as making thorium resistant to proliferation. MIT has more to say about this proliferation protection in their summary:

On one hand, high radiation dose [from U-232 decay] provides self protection to separated fissile material against diversion and misuse. On the other hand, it makes the U-233 recycling more complex and costly.

The point here is that the U-233 is in fact subject to ‘diversion and misuse’ (like atomic bombs) if it can be separated out from the highly radioactive U-232 contaminants. If the U-232 is not somehow processed out, however, there is no way to operate the reactor for peaceful purposes, or otherwise.

Oak Ridge National Laboratory

Filtering contaminants out of thorium bred U-233 to make weapons grade fissile material is not rocket science. Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) created a process to do this. They kindly wrote about it in a history included in the ORNL Review publication (search the long page for the words “THOREX” or “Uranium-233”):

By 1954, the Laboratory’s chemical technologists had completed a pilot plant demonstrating the ability of the THOREX process to separate thorium, protactinium, and uranium-233 from fission products and from each other. This process could isolate uranium-233 for weapons development and also for use as fuel in the proposed thorium breeder reactors.

There are no technical issues for separating out Uranium-233 for weapons development.

UK National Nuclear Laboratory

The United Kingdom’s National Nuclear Laboratory (NNL) prepared a position paper on the thorium nuclear fuel cycle. It is pretty straightforward:

Contrary to that which many proponents of thorium claim, U-233 should be regarded as posing a definite proliferation risk. For a thorium fuel cycle which falls short of a breeding cycle, uranium fuel would always be needed to supplement the fissile material and there will always be significant (though reduced) plutonium production.

NNL believes that U-233 should be regarded as posing a comparable level of proliferation risk to High Enriched Uranium (HEU) and comparable with the U-Pu fuel cycle at best; this view is consistent with the IAEA, who under the Convention on the Physical Protection of Nuclear Materials, categorise U-233 on the same basis as plutonium. Attempts to lower the fissile content of uranium by adding U-238 are considered to offer only weak protection, as the U-233 could be separated in a centrifuge cascade in the same way that U-235 is separated from U-238 in the standard uranium fuel cycle.


The argument that the high U-232 content would be self- protecting are considered to be over-stated.
NNL’s view is that thorium systems are no more proliferation resistant than U-Pu systems though they may offer limited benefits in some circumstances.

Here are some comments from other resources:

Oak Ridge National Labs U-233 Disposition Project Update (PDF, see page 3)

  • U-233 has nuclear properties similar to weapons-grade plutonium, but the chemistry of uranium
    • High specific alpha activity (inhalation hazard)
    • Weapons-usable fissile nuclear material requiring strict safeguards, tight security, and criticality control

Beyond Nuclear’s Ten Myths About Throrium As A Nuclear Energy Solution (PDF, see page 2)

Uranium-233 is also excellent weapons-grade material. Unlike any other type of uranium fuel, uranium-233 is 100 percent enriched from the outset and thus is an excellent weapons-grade material and as effective as plutonium-239 for making nuclear bombs. This makes it very proliferation-prone and a tempting target for theft by criminal and terrorist organizations and for use by national governments in creating nuclear weapons.

The USA has successfully tested weapon/s using uranium-233 cores. India may be interested in the military potential of thorium/uranium-233 in addition to civil applications. India is refusing to allow safeguards to apply to its entire ‘advanced’ thorium/plutonium fuel cycle, stongly suggesting a military dimension.

…thorium can’t fuel a reactor by itself: rather, a uranium- or plutonium fueled reactor can convert thorium-232 into fissionable (and plutonium-like, highly bomb-usable) ura- nium-233. Thorium’s proliferation, waste, safety, and cost problems differ only in detail from uranium’s…

There are also numerous other resources at the Thorium Nuclear Information Resources page in this blog.

Please let me know if there are any other important additions, or if you believe this is all wrong, please do let me know via the comments section below.

Advertisements

6 thoughts on “Thorium Nuclear Bombs (Shorter Version)

  1. Pingback: Thorium bred Uranium-233 can be used to make atomic bombs « nuclear-news

  2. Pingback: Yes you CAN make nuclear bombs from Thorium bred Uranium-233 « Antinuclear

  3. The statement “If the U-232 is not some how processed out,
    there is no way to operate the reactor for peaceful purposes or otherwise”
    is false. In a molten salt reactor producing U-233 (and some U-232)
    from Thorium the entire primary loop is extremely radioactive.
    The additional radioactivity from U-232 is relatively speaking negligible.
    None of the designs that I am familiar with have any intention
    of separating the U-232 from the U-233. There is absolutely no point
    and to attempt to do so would be near impossible since you would
    have to run yr centrifuges hot.

    This is also why the Denatured Molten salt reactor is so proliferation resistant.
    In this design, the fraction of U-233 is always less than 12% of the total U.
    If a breakaway state extracted the uranium from the salt
    — not to difficult to do — they would still have to enrich it big time.
    Again this would require running the centrifuges hot because of the U-232.

    No sentient bombmaker would go this route. Much easier
    to graab some natural U and enrich it conventionally.

  4. Pingback: Thorium can be used to produce weapons grade uranium 233 « uranium news

  5. Pingback: Yes Virginia, you can make nuclear weapons fuel from Thorium « nuclear-news.info

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s